Monday, October 19, 2009

Republicans LOVE Gang Rape 30-7 over all other forms of rape.


To see a more complete list of RAPE loving Senators please visit the link provided.

Arizona really seems to like gang Rape. Senators Kyl and McCain both voted against a womans right to sue after being gang raped.

Georgia: Chambliss (R-GA), Nay Isakson (R-GA), Nay Who Didn't expect Georgia to love Rape.

Idaho, seems more like a rallying cry for Senators Chambliss (R-GA), Nay and
Isakson (R-GA), Nay

Kansas seems to like a good old unwelcome snogging: Brownback (R-KS), Nay Roberts (R-KS), Nay

You sure got a pretty mouth, what say you drop them trousers?
Kentucky: Bunning (R-KY), Nay McConnell (R-KY), Nay
I guess we could not expect more from Appalachia.

Vitter of Louisianan likes em a wee bit unable to defend themselves before during and after.

I am not even going to defend Mississippi. 2 nays to suing for gang rape. from the Evangelical capitol of the world.

Senator Ethics, erm cough I mean Ensign of Nevada, a big ol Nay for suing for rape.

Senator Gregg from the live free or die state, says no way to getting paid for having your freedoms removed via your vagina.

Oklahoma it's OK, to be gang raped in a trailer.
Inhofe and Coburn 2 Nays from the OK state.

South Carolina, need I say more?

Wyoming: Barrasso (R-WY), Nay Enzi (R-WY), Nay
Must get cold and Lonely on the range in winter. The same state that gave us Matthew Shepard now gives us a big thumbs up for the the protection of huge multi-national companies.

Thank you Republican Party.

Now on with the Show


Behold, 30 U.S. senators who don't give a damn about battered women
By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist
Friday, October 16, 2009


The world's tallest domestic dog? Adorable. The world's biggest newborn baby? Sad and disturbing.

Waterless urinals in every new building in Los Angeles? A positive step. Canada's disgusting oilsands and Coal Country, a new documentary detailing the environmental atrocities in Appalachia? Heart wrenching and depressing.

Jimmy Page showing Jack White and the Edge how to play "When the Levee Breaks" in It Might Get Loud? All flavors of awesome. Garth Brooks coming out of retirement? Anesthetizing.

See, it's all a matter of perspective. It's all a matter of context and spin, into which bin we toss the delightful refuse of our culture to recycle and re-use it another day.

It is with this wonky filter in mind we turn our gaze to the gaping hellmouth that is the U.S. Senate, that drab cauldron of grumpy old men, defeminized women and tiny handful of rebellious dissenters, all of whom claim to have your best interests at heart but mostly only really give a damn about which lobbyist will help them best make their next boat payment.

Do I sound a little bitter? I cannot imagine why. Let us watch the senate and see if we can figure it out.

Look at them shuffle and sneer, hem and haw! Watch as they willingly eat their own souls with an ice pick and some turpentine, then step up to the media microphones and try to sound ennobled and magnanimous when in fact they only make everyone within earshot feel lost and fatalistic. So cute.

It's the same old spectacle, isn't it? There they go, tossing around the health care reform issue like it didn't affect millions of humans every single day, throwing in massive compromises and snags just so the GOP can fellate its pals in the insurance industry and a gaggle of aggrieved Democrats can get their egos fluffed and you still won't be able to get a decent dental plan for your family.

But now, just for fun, let's take it a step further. Or rather, darker. Let's go ahead and step right onto one of those large, rusty nails sticking up from the senate floor, so painful as to make your stomach turn, a bit of your lunch jump back into your throat.

It's a story from the dark political underbelly that makes you question the entire setup, rethink humanity, and lean out your window and scream: what the hell is wrong with these people? Who are they, really? Why do we give them power?

Here is freshman Minnesota senator Al Franken's first-ever legislative action, a relatively simple, almost laughably surefire bill requiring the Pentagon no longer do business with any contractor -- hi, Halliburton! -- that requires its employees to agree that she cannot sue said contractor if she is, oh let's just say, gang raped by its employees.

You read that right. It's a can't-sue-us-if-you're-raped clause. In a U.S. government contract. Aimed squarely at Halliburton. Thanks, Dick Cheney!

First, you are required to get over your initial disgust that such legislation is even necessary, that such clauses even exist and that the Pentagon is already doing business with such contractors (hi, Halliburton/KBR!), and that there has already been a truly horrible case validating it, wherein a 20-year-old female employee was allegedly gang-raped by contractors, locked in a shipping container, abused every way from Sunday, and found out later she was unable to sue.

Let us pause to imagine if, say, Wal-Mart had such a clause. Or maybe Toys 'R' Us. Starbucks. Let us imagine the appalled outcry. But Halliburton? Dick Cheney's vile little spitwad of shameless war profiteering? No problem. Hey, it's Republican-endorsed military contracting. No one said it was ethical.

But that's not most the repellant part. Ready?

The most repellant part is the 30 U.S. senators -- Republicans each and every one -- who just stepped forth to vote against the Franken amendment, essentially saying no, women should have no right to sue if they are sexually abused or gang raped, Halliburton and its ilk must be protected at all costs, and by the way we hereby welcome Satan into our rancid souls forevermore. God bless America.

Let us repeat, for clarity. Franken's amendment passed with a vote of 68-30. Meaning 30 U.S. senators voted against the elimination of the rape/sue clause. Meghan McCain, call your dad. He's one of them.

Here is where you try and do it. Here is where you bring in the filter mentioned above, try to figure out where to slot such wretched information, how to make even the slightest sense of it.

And then you discover a horrible truth: you can't. Turns out, when faced with such vileness, all filters fail. All balance is thrown off. You thought you had some sort of way to process and attain perspective? You are proven wrong.

So perhaps all we can do is ponder how pathetic and sad these various senator's lives must be, how these bitter old men will now go home at night and announce around the dinner table that, yes, today they worked very hard to help improve the welfare of the nation by essentially enabling rape and sexual abuse, tried their darndest to prevent women who've been viciously attacked from having much legal recourse. And lo, Satan will chuckle happily.

Then maybe these senators will try and hug their wives, or their daughters. And maybe, if there's any justice in the universe, their wives and daughters will slap them as hard as humanly possible, lock them in a shipping container, and never let them touch them again.
P.S.; Would you like a complete list of these 30 senators' names? Right here.

Why look, there's grandpa McCain. There's disgraced man-child John Ensign. Hooker-lovin' David Vitter. Saxby Chambliss. Inhofe. It's a veritable welfare-state who's who of Dick Cheney's sanctum of oily fluffers, and many more who would love to be. Shall we write a nice letter to them? Or maybe their wives and daughters?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Your Linguistic Profile:

45% General American English
35% Yankee
10% Dixie
10% Upper Midwestern
0% Midwestern
What Kind of American English Do You Speak?

Your Taste in Music:

80's Alternative: Highest Influence
90's Alternative: Highest Influence
Classic Rock: Highest Influence
Progressive Rock: Highest Influence
80's Pop: High Influence
Punk: High Influence
Alternative Rock: Medium Influence
Heavy Metal: Medium Influence
Ska: Medium Influence
80's R&B: Low Influence
80's Rock: Low Influence
90's Pop: Low Influence
90's Rock: Low Influence
Gangsta Rap: Low Influence
Hair Bands: Low Influence
How's Your Taste in Music?

create your own visited states map or check out these Google Hacks.
INTP - the Architect
You scored 50% I to E, 26% N to S, 52% F to T, and 65% J to P!
You are more introverted than extroverted. You are more intuitive than observant, you are more thinking based than feeling based, and you prefer to go with the flow rather than have a routine. The single word to describe your type is the Architect, which belongs to the larger group of rationals. You wish to sculpt the world around you. Others often find you arrogant, yet you have no desire to direct others, only to inform them. You must know the structure of things, and have a voracious appetite for knowledge. You are very rational in everything you do, and probably consider yourself smarter than most.
As a romantic partner, you can be playful with great energy to get things started, but not quite as good on follow through. You may have a tendency to hurt the more emotional types unintentionally by not sharing your own reactions and feelings as you can get swept up in your own ideas and projects. You want to be appreciated for your ability to respond quickly and to fix problems creatively. You need plenty of time to yourself - therefore your parnter must respect your need for independence and originality.
Your group summary: Rationals (NT)
Your type summary: INTP



My test tracked 4 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 65% on I to E
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 25% on N to S
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 50% on F to T
free online dating free online dating
You scored higher than 73% on J to P
Link: The LONG Scientific Personality Test written by unpretentious2 on Ok Cupid